There’s nothing new. I was just reading a blog post by a man
leaning in his faith to Universalism. The idea that there are many paths to
God. That if one leads a Christ like life, you have embraced
Christ, whether you acknowledge Him as Savior or not.
I remember wondering 50 years ago “How could it be possible for someone
who had never heard of Christ through an accident of geography and birth, yet
lived a good life, go to hell?” Or asking myself the question, “Do I really
believe that Gandhi and Hitler ended up in the same place?” So really, there’s
nothing new, each generation of believers has to struggle with the same
questions their forbears grappled with.
It doesn’t help that, contrary to what my fundamentalist
friends believe, on issue after issue the Bible is ambiguous, not black and
white. Or that many fine Christians disagree on the purpose and relevance of
many passages in the Bible for today’s culture. Not many would say that stoning
adulterers to death is an appropriate penalty for adultery in today's society. Jesus
said take care of the poor, Paul said unless they can work. So what’s the
point? I’ve come to believe that scripture is the total revealed mind of God,
that you cannot contain an infinite God in a finite text. So there’s going to
be some lack of clarity and unanimity among believers.
Here’s how I feel about Universalism. I believe that Jesus
meant it when He said that “No man comes to the Father except by me.” That’s how I choose to witness. Many times I
find people reject that teaching while embracing Christ, so I’ll leave it to God
to decide if that’s good enough. In the
meantime if someone embraces the teachings of Christ as they would a great
philosopher, the worlds a better place. So I settle for that.
All Jesus asked of me was to carry the message. I do that,
albeit poorly, and know that all will be revealed, just not here on earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment