I’m conflicted. There
are so many things wrong with the way today's churches relate themselves to the
communities they serve, yet too many of the alternatives being put forth as a
solution to the increasing lack of relevance in the church seem as irrelevant
as the practices they seek to replace.
Lets be clear about this. The church in America is in
decline, fully 20% of Americans self-identify as “Nones” and that trend seems
to be accelerating. And the solutions to this stunning decline being advanced
by various groups reflect to a remarkable degree the soul searching in the
Republican party post 2012 election.The same demographic trends that caused a majority of voters to reject Republican policy in 5 of the last 6 presidential
elections has sent the church into a downward spiral during that same time
period.
Remaining the same church that is in decline seems as
unappealing a solution as some of the ideas put forth by radical/anarchist
Christians, and therein lies the conflict. Empowering women, people of color,
changing our focus from social causes like gay marriage and abortion to social
justice issues such as poverty, global warming and hunger might be a debate better
worked out between believers of good will rather than a solution to the decline
of the church. Because if a definitive resolution of those disagreements is the
key to the survival of the church, we may well be doomed. Too many Christians
treat their individual stand on these issues as deal breakers.
So what can we do? First of all, don’t rely on me for the
answers, seek solutions and answers on your own, talk with other believers,
pray, read what others have to say paying particular attention to those you
disagree with because chances are the ultimate solutions will be gray, not
black and white. But, since you asked, here’s what I think. Let’s preach less Paul
and more Jesus.
It seems that the only times of the year we spend in
intensive examination of Jesus is at Easter and Christmas, the rest of the year
it’s all Paul. Which is really silly when you think of it, Jesus as infant and
then crucified leaves out so much of the story that transfixed and then
transformed the world that all by itself it could be classified as spiritual
malfeasance. Don’t get me wrong, Paul was a giant of the faith but he was not
the faith. Many of his writings were deeply moving and lyrical, but more so
than the words of Jesus? Nah. Can you
find a better answer to the curious than our Lord’s respnse to John the
Baptist, who asked “Are you the one who was to come?” “So he
replied to the messengers, “Go back and report to John
what you have seen and heard: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who
have leprosy
are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is
preached to the poor.” Luke 7:22 That’s the message that will restore
the church.
We have the most attractive personality in
history to share with others and instead we preach Paul, we impose conditions
on others that Jesus never did, we have crafted an impossibly complicated
theology that is nowhere found in Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John, and we wonder
why our youth are fleeing the church in droves and the message of Paul falls on
deaf ears outside the sanctuary.
So maybe we can start there, get back to
Jesus. See if that is a more attractive message than the one we’ve been
delivering.
No comments:
Post a Comment